Nuclear Radius and Density

Nuclear Radius

We have now discussed how we go about measuring / approximating the radius of an atomic nucleus.

If we collect information on the radii of different nuclei, we can create a graph of nuclear radius (R) against nucleon number (A):

NuclearRadiusExponential NuclearRadiusExponential

It is clear to see this shows an exponential fashion of growth. This suggests it may show a linear correlation when plotted on a log graph, and indeed it does:

NuclearRadiusLog NuclearRadiusLog

Those readers who take / have got sufficiently far into A-Level Maths will know that a log graph (a graph where the quantities on both axes are logged) can be written as follows:

logA=mlogB+logc

Applied to the context of the graph above, we get:

lnR=13lnA+lnR0

The gradient being 13 is found by simply analysing the graph. Furthermore, the y-intercept (R0) is known to be roughly 1.4×1015 m or 1.4 femtometres.

Using the laws of logarithms, let us rearrange the equation above:

lnR=lnA13+lnR0 lnR=ln(R0A13) elnR=eln(R0A13) R=R0A13

As you can see, this gives us the final equation of:

R=R0A13

Where,

R - The radius of the nucleus

A - The nucleon number of the nucleus

R0 - 1.4fm (see more information at the end of this page)

Nuclear Density

Now we have a generalised equation for the expected radius of any atomic nucleus, we can find a generalised equation for density. Let us try this:

ρ=mv ρ=A×mnucleon43πR3 ρ=A×mnucleon43π(R0A13)3 ρ=3×mnucleon4πR03

The alert reader will quickly notice that this final equation is constituted by only constants, and will realise this leads to the conclusion that the nuclear density is the same in all nuclei, no matter the element them make up!

The method requires one to take the radius of protons and neutrons to be identical, which we know they are not. However, they are so close that the resulting density is a close enough approximation.

If you substitute the values of the constants used in the density equation, you get a value of —

ρ=1.45×1017kgm3

To give you an idea of exactly how dense nuclear matter is, let us approximate the weight of a shot glass if we filled its full volume with nuclear matter:

We’ll assume the shot glass has a volume of 44ml or 4.4×105.

ρ=massvolume mass=ρ×volume =1.45×1017×4.4×105 =6.38×1012kg

That’s a pretty heavy shot!

What is R0?

Many sources fail to explain intuitively what R0 really is so I want to cover it here.

Let us look back at the previous graph:

NuclearRadiusLog NuclearRadiusLog

We can see that lnR0 is the y-intercept. Therefore, it is the value of the equation when lnA=0. This is not the same as when A is 0:

lnA=0 A=e0 A=1

It is, in fact, the value that is measured when there is a nucleon number of 1; it is the radius of a single nucleon!! Therefore, you can think of R0 as the radius of a neutron or proton.

Another way of looking at this is by considering R0 as the radius of a nucleon to begin with and considering how this would be used to find the radius of the nucleus as a whole:

The volume of each nucleon - if we take it to be spherical and have a radius R0 - would be:

Vnucleon=43πR03

Therefore, for a nucleus with atomic number A, the volume would be

Vnucleus=A×43πR03

If we say the nucleus has radius R, we can rewrite this as:

43πR3=A×43πR03

Which cancels to give:

R=R0A13

I hope this shows an intuitive way of understanding the value of R_0.